Bush Mongolia Pictures
Iwan Baan was one of the photographers that had access to President Bush`s visit to Mongolia. Again he has made some striking images, available at iwan.com.
---
technorati: mongolia bush
Labels: chinggis khaan
Life in the Land of the Blue Heaven
Labels: chinggis khaan
Registan mentions what is in the blogs about the visit and he also includes the "Wapo" article. But there is more.
"Like the ideology of communism, the ideology of Islamic radicalism is destined to fall because the will to power is no match for the universal desire to live in liberty,"
USA Today tells us:
The Mongolians have been rewarded with $11 million in U.S. aid to improve military forces.Gee - what would they need that for? Trying to invade China? Conquer Siberia? Or maybe help some criticized US president in a desert war?
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Sunday that "one has to be concerned" about China's modernization of its 2.5 million-member army. "There's a question of intent," she said.
The first video footage comes from a blog , but both Reuters and AP have pictures up already, one in the Laura Bush picture gallery and the other in a Iraq war gallery. That's all that seems to matter. But impressive how fast they get it out on the web (see also previous post).
While Mongolia prepares for The Big Day, CNN seems happy to portray Mongolia as weak and dependent on Big Brother US:
Remote country looks to U.S. to counter sway of giant neighbors
Labels: confusion
Life is full of surprises as New Mongols discovers. I think all that is feared here is a surprise.
There is a lot of donor money going into Mongolia. The question is whether it is good to have so much aid coming your way and whether the aid that comes is actually good in itself. Morris Rossabi recently wrote a book “Modern Mongolia: From Khans to Commissars to Capitalists” in which he argues that foreign donors actually have seriously disrupted Mongolia, rather than helped the country.
“The book’s exaggeration of the role of the donors obscures one central fact: Mongolia has emerged as a truly self-governing and independent country for the first time in centuries.”
I have no problem at all with criticism of aid. I have been a strong critic of it myself, and I am on record as saying that bad foreign aid is the greatest threat to Mongolia's future. But Rossabi's book is much more than a criticism of aid -- he presents a very bleak picture of what is happening in Mongolia, repeats gossip about individual Mongolians and about events that are inaccurate and unfounded. I deliberately avoided trying to defend foreign aid in my review, because I felt it was far more important to point out that Mongolia is doing much better than he suggests. My review is NOT about foreign aid, it is about Mongolia!!!
New Mongols ask an interesting question, and actually get an answer. Why does George Bush come to Mongolia? The answer, however, is not all that revealing.
In Mongolia, the President and Mrs. Bush will be greeted with an arrival ceremony at Government House, and then the President will meet with the President of Mongolia, and following that, with the Prime Minister.
That afternoon, the President will deliver remarks at Mongolian Government House. And following those remarks, the President and Mrs. Bush will visit Ikh Tenger and then participate in an embassy event at the airport. They will then depart en route Andrews Air Force Base.
For many years the Lonely Planet Mongolia was the only English guidebook on Mongolia, but not everybody was too happy with it. Comments varied from:
This is the first guidebook I read that basically tells me not to go thereto:
This is a history book, it's completely outdatedBut last year good old Michael Kohn, took up the job to revise the lonely planet. He traveled all over the place and incorporated everything in lp's new set-up.
For independent travellers without preplanned itineraries the Lonely Planet is the better choice — as well as focusing more on practical information, it's more recent and noticeably lighter and more compact. Those doing an organised tour and less concerned about practicalities may lean towards the Bradt's more extensive background information. And its personal stories may be more helpful for those deciding whether or not to visit Mongolia. I found both books useful, both before and during my trip, and any sizeable group will want both.
María E. Fernández-Giménez has published several articles on the ecological perception and management decisions of Mongolian herders. In The role of Mongolian nomadic pastoralists’ecological knowledge in rangeland management she quotes Holechek et al. on the classification livestock and their khamar (translated as muzzle but literally nose):
The five types of Mongolian livestock are similarly classified as cool-muzzle (seruun khamar), hot-muzzle (khaluun khamar), or intermediate animals. Cool-muzzled animals (camels and goats), must graze in "hot" territories, whereas hot-muzzled animals (yaks and horses) are best suited to "cool" territories. Sheep, traditionally the backbone of the Mongolian pastoral economy, are adaptable to both
types of habitats. This classification of livestock and their foraging habits corresponds closely with theWestern classification of range animals as grazers (warmmuzzled animals), browsers (cool-muzzled animals), and intermediate feeders (Holechek et al. 1989).